Programmes measured on outcomes, not attendance
Three representative programmes showing how assessment, targeted development and re-scoring change a fleet’s risk profile. Organisations are described by sector rather than named, and the figures are illustrative placeholders.
Aggregate across all programmes
- 386
- Drivers assessed to date
- 29%
- Average reduction in high-risk classification
- 4.6/5
- Average driver satisfaction score
Regional Engineering Firm
48 drivers · 44 vans, 4 cars
32% reduction in high-risk driving behaviours
The challenge
A multi-site mechanical and electrical contractor was carrying a rising at-fault claims frequency, almost entirely low-speed damage on customer sites and kerbside. Insurers had flagged the trend at renewal and the business had no documented view of which drivers were driving it.
Our approach
- 01Fleet-wide 90-minute on-road assessment across all 48 drivers over nine weeks
- 02Risk classification and a fleet summary identifying manoeuvring and gap selection as the dominant themes
- 03Targeted development for the 14 drivers classified Medium or High risk
- 04Re-assessment of the development cohort at four months
The outcome
Recorded high-risk behaviours across the assessed cohort fell by 32% at re-assessment. At-fault damage incidents fell from 47 to 22 over the following twelve months, and the broker accepted the programme documentation as evidence of active risk management at renewal.
“We knew we had a problem on site manoeuvring but we could not prove where it sat. The reports gave us fourteen names and a plan for each of them. That is the first time fleet risk has been actionable for us.”
- 48
- Drivers assessed
- 32%
- Fewer high-risk behaviours
- £41,600
- Estimated annual damage avoided
- 9 wks
- Full fleet completed
Risk distribution: before and after
Share of the assessed cohort in each classification.
At-fault incidents by quarter
Twelve months before the programme against the twelve months following it.
Post-programme classification mix
Measured at re-assessment following the development phase.
Metropolitan Housing Provider
126 drivers · repairs & maintenance
Grey fleet brought inside a single risk framework
The challenge
A housing provider ran 96 liveried repairs vans alongside 30 employees using their own vehicles for tenant visits. The grey fleet was effectively unmanaged: no documented risk assessment, inconsistent insurance evidence and no visibility of driver competence.
Our approach
- 01Policy gap review against HSE driving-for-work guidance
- 02Assessment of all 126 drivers, including grey fleet, to one standard
- 03Journey risk review of estate access, reversing and pedestrian exposure
- 04Rolling annual re-assessment built into the induction process
The outcome
Every driver, including the grey fleet, now sits within one documented risk framework with a review date. Reversing and manoeuvring incidents on estates fell 27% year on year, and the internal audit committee closed a long-standing open finding on work-related road risk.
“Our grey fleet was the gap nobody wanted to open. Foresight assessed those thirty drivers to exactly the same standard as our own vans, and now I can show the committee a single register.”
- 126
- Drivers assessed
- 100%
- Grey fleet documented
- 27%
- Fewer reversing incidents
- 4.6/5
- Driver satisfaction
Risk distribution: before and after
Share of the assessed cohort in each classification.
At-fault incidents by quarter
Twelve months before the programme against the twelve months following it.
Post-programme classification mix
Measured at re-assessment following the development phase.
Regional Water Utility
212 drivers · emergency response
Fuel down 9.4% across a 212-driver response fleet
The challenge
A water utility operating a 24/7 emergency response fleet faced fuel and maintenance costs rising faster than mileage, plus a cluster of harsh-braking events in telematics data concentrated in night-shift crews.
Our approach
- 01Telematics-led triage to prioritise the 60 highest-exposure drivers
- 02Combined eco-driving and defensive driving delivery with measured baseline routes
- 03Night-shift specific coaching on fatigue, low-light observation and speed choice
- 04Quarterly management information pack aligned to the fleet KPI dashboard
The outcome
Measured fuel consumption fell 9.4% across the programme cohort and harsh-braking events dropped 38% in the six months following delivery. Tyre and brake replacement intervals extended measurably, and the programme now runs on a rolling annual cycle.
“The measured baseline is what sold it internally. We were not asked to believe in a saving — we were shown the same route, same driver, same van, nine per cent less fuel.”
- 212
- Drivers in programme
- 9.4%
- Fuel consumption reduction
- 38%
- Fewer harsh-braking events
- £118k
- Annualised cost saving
Risk distribution: before and after
Share of the assessed cohort in each classification.
At-fault incidents by quarter
Twelve months before the programme against the twelve months following it.
Post-programme classification mix
Measured at re-assessment following the development phase.
These case studies are illustrative: client organisations are described by sector and scale rather than named, and the figures shown are representative placeholders for demonstration rather than audited client results. Real outcomes depend on fleet profile, programme scope and the actions an organisation takes on the findings, and are never a guarantee.
Talk about your fleetWhat fleet, safety and operations leaders tell us
Feedback of the kind gathered at client programme reviews, from the three roles that own fleet risk: fleet management, operations and health & safety.
“The written reports are the difference. Our previous provider gave the driver a chat and us nothing. Now every driver has a scored report on file and I can walk into an audit with it.”
“We assessed 62 engineers across four depots in under three months without losing a single scheduled job. The scheduling was handled around our diary, not theirs.”
“The Low, Medium, High classification changed the conversation with our board. Twenty-nine per cent of our drivers were High risk. That number got the training budget approved in one meeting.”
“What I appreciated was the tone. Our engineers are experienced people and they would have rejected anything that felt like a driving lesson. This felt like a professional review, and they took it seriously.”
“We used the post-incident assessment for a driver returning after a serious collision. It gave HR and me a documented recommendation instead of a judgement call. That was worth a great deal to us.”
“Our broker specifically asked what we were doing about driver risk at renewal. Handing over the fleet summary report and the development records was the most useful ten minutes of that meeting.”
Names, job titles and organisations shown here are illustrative placeholders created for this site rather than named client references.
Anticipating Risk. Protecting Drivers.
Protect your drivers before risk becomes an incident.
A 45-minute consultation gives you a clear view of where your fleet risk is concentrated, what it is likely costing you, and a costed plan to reduce it. No obligation.