HSE guidance for employers organises work-related road risk into three areas: the journey, the driver or rider, and the vehicle. It is a useful structure because it separates things that are often confused — a driver behaving unsafely under an impossible schedule is a journey problem as much as a driver problem.
The driver
Holding a licence establishes entitlement. It does not, on its own, tell an employer how someone drives when they are working, under time pressure, in a loaded van, on roads they may not know well.
- Licence entitlement confirmed for the vehicle being driven, and re-checked periodically rather than once at recruitment.
- Eyesight meeting the standard required for driving.
- Practical competence in the type of vehicle and driving the role involves.
- Health conditions, medication and fatigue considered.
- Awareness of the organisation’s driving-for-work expectations.
Employers can check the licence information of an employee who has given permission, using the GOV.UK licence checking services. Practical assessment adds the part a licence check cannot show: observed driving behaviour.
The vehicle
Vehicle risk covers suitability as well as condition. A vehicle can be perfectly roadworthy and still be poorly matched to the task — too large for the access it needs, or without a safe way to carry the load it is being asked to carry.
- Vehicle suitable for the task, the load and the environment.
- Servicing and MOT current; defects identified and put right.
- Daily walkaround checks actually carried out, not only recorded.
- Loads secured and payload not exceeded.
- Safety technology understood by the driver and left switched on.
- A documented, low-friction route for drivers to report defects and safety concerns.
The journey
Journey risk is where organisational decisions show up. Distance, scheduling, appointment density, start times and weather all shape how the driving is done.
- Schedules that do not depend on exceeding speed limits to be achievable.
- Route planning that avoids unnecessary risk where a reasonable alternative exists.
- Limits on daily distance and driving hours, with rest breaks built into long journeys.
- A clear position on adverse weather, and who makes the call.
- A genuine right for a driver to decline or reschedule an unsafe journey.
Bringing the three together
Arrangements tend to be strongest where the three areas inform each other. Assessment findings that repeatedly mention rushed driving may say more about scheduling than about drivers. Repeated low-speed damage may point to vehicle choice rather than competence. Reviewing the three areas together is usually more productive than treating them as separate workstreams.
Please note
Information on this website is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. For advice on your organisation’s specific duties, consult a qualified health and safety practitioner or legal adviser and refer to current HSE guidance.